Modified Carryover Basis Regime – U.S. Estate Tax for Deaths that Occurred in 2010



On Dec. 17, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act. Among other provisions, the Tax Relief Act modified and extended the estate tax provisions of 2010 through Dec. 31, 2012 only, resulting in a retroactive reinstatement of the U.S. estate tax for deaths that occurred in 2010.

For beneficiaries of decedents in 2010, U.S. Congress provided two systems of taxing estates and determining basis of their assets: the decedent’s beneficiaries will have the choice of either applying the federal estate tax or making use of the “modified carryover basis regime.”

Executors of those estates are left to determine the better course.

To do so, especially for valuations of gross estates valued over the new $5 million exclusion, they must take many factors and considerations into account. The beneficiaries will need to choose between receiving an unlimited “step up” and use the available $5 million exclusion or elect out of the U.S. estate tax, chose a limited step up in the taxation basis of the inherited property and, instead allow assets to pass tax-free to the beneficiaries under the modified carryover basis regime with its own basis for exclusions but without the step-up to fair market value upon the date of death.

For income tax purposes, the income tax basis of an asset is the price paid for the property plus the value of certain improvements. In the case of stocks and bonds, the basis equals the purchase price whereas for real estate the basis equals the purchase price plus the value of all capital improvements (special assessments levied during the years of ownership) as well as real estate closing costs.

For the tax years prior to and following 2010, beneficiaries of an estate are entitled to receive a “step up” in the basis of the property they inherit meaning regardless of what the decedent paid for the property, the beneficiaries will inherit the property at the fair market value as of the date of death. So if the decedent paid $500,000 for the real estate and did not make any capital improvements and at the date of death the fair market value of the real estate had increased to $750,000, then the beneficiaries would inherit the property with a stepped up income tax basis of $750,000.

“Modified Carryover Basis Regime”

Only for deaths that occurred in 2010 would the decedent’s beneficiaries have the choice to either take a full step up in basis or use the modified carryover basis regime. If the beneficiaries opt to apply the modified carryover basis rules, then it means that the property will pass at the lesser of:

A) the fair market value on the date of death; or

B) the decedent’s original income tax basis in the property plus the value of certain improvements, but not at the full stepped up basis.

For example, if a decedent paid $300,000 for real estate and did not make any capital improvements to it, and the fair market value at the date of death in 2010 increased to $500,000, then the beneficiaries would inherit the property with a carryover income tax basis of $300,000. However, if the fair market of the value of the property decreased to $200,000 upon the decedent’s date of death, then the beneficiaries’ basis in the property would only be $200,000.

That said, the carryover basis is subject to adjustment under the modified carryover basis rules. Where the decedent is neither a resident nor a citizen of the U.S. (Canadian decedent owning US real estate), the modified basis carryover rules limit the amount of the basis increase to $60,000 (as opposed to $1,300,000 for a US resident/citizen).

Examples of Applying the Modified Carryover Basis Regime to a Deceased Person’s Property

Using the example above, a non-spouse beneficiary can only increase the carryover basis by up to $60,000 so that the non-spouse’s beneficiary’s modified carryover basis will be $360,000 instead of $500,000.

Thus, if the beneficiary sells the property with a modified carryover basis of $360,000 shortly after the decedent’s death for the fair market value of $500,000, then the beneficiary will owe capital gains tax on the net gain of $140,000, which is the difference between the sales price and the non-spouse beneficiary’s modified carryover basis:

$500,000 – $360,000 fair market value modified carryover basis = $140,000 net gain

Contrast this with the sale of the property by applying a full step up in basis, in which case the basis of the property will be stepped up to the date of death value of $500,000 so that the sale will not generate any capital gains taxes:

$500,000 fair market value – $500,000 stepped up basis = $0 net gain

Using the same example, if the property has an original income tax basis of $300,000 but the date of death fair market value has decreased to $200,000, then the basis inherited by the beneficiaries will be $200,000 because the basis cannot be increased beyond the fair market value at date of death.

In light of the above, estate planners who have clients who died in 2010 will have to work with the deceased client’s estate representative to determine whether to make an election provided under the Tax Relief Act.

If the client’s estate is worth less than $5 million, the estate representative generally will not make the election when filing form 706NA “United States Estate (and Generation-
Skipping Transfer) Tax Return: Estate of nonresident not a citizen of the United States”. Doing so will allow the assets of the estate to receive a step-up in basis; and the estate representative will not have to deal with the obscure modified carryover basis rules.

If the client’s estate is worth more than $5 million, the client’s estate representative may opt for the Modified Carryover Basis regime by preparing and filing no later than January 17, 2012 form 8939: “Allocation of Increase in Basis for Property Acquired From a Decedent: To be filed for decedents dying after December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2011”.

Factors that may provide the estate planner with hints of the best strategy to deploy include:

  • Fair Market Value of the property (i.e. gain or loss vs. Tax basis);
  • Anticipated future sale of the property;
  • Estate tax vs. Capital Gain tax;
  • Canadian deemed disposition at date of death; and
  • The relative size of the estate.

Canadian executors should always seek advice from qualified Cross Border tax and estate Specialists.

Radio Show – November 24, 2011

Montreal, Quebec – November 24, 2011

On the November 24th episode of Dollars and Sense on CJAD 800 AM, host, Matt Altro and legal expert David A. Altro discuss Owning U.S. Property – The Canadian Way, 2nd Edition and all the important issues surrounding Canadians buying property in the U.S. and moving to the U.S.

David answers your questions and explains U.S. tax laws and their implications and how to protect yourself and your family from the U.S. probate procedure, creditors, taxes and much more.

Part 1


Part 2


Part 3


Part 4


Part 5


Part 6

David A. Altro interviewed by the Toronto Sun


U.S. property investment pitfalls easy to overcome

SHARON SINGLETON, QMI Agency
The Toronto Sun
November 10, 2011


A growing number of Canadians are tempted by property bargains in the U.S., but are being put off by bad information about the possible tax pitfalls, according to David Altro, a lawyer and author of a book on the subject.

The baby boomer generation is looking for a warm place to retire and being lured by property at bargain-basement levels, making Canadians the biggest foreign investors in U.S. real estate.

“I wrote this book because there is a lot of mis-information out there for Canadians wanting to buy or move to the U.S.,” Altro said, whose Owning U.S. Property The Canadian Way is now into its second edition.

Much of it revolves around the potential tax bill and bureaucratic headaches for family members trying to sort out the estate upon the death of the property owner.

Altro said a lot of these problems can be avoided completely by setting up an irrevocable cross-border trust. That will help provide protection from creditors for your children and get around expensive U.S. laws on probate.

Similarly, placing your property in a trust is also beneficial if either you or your spouse becomes incapacitated. Under U.S. law, if one person becomes incapacitated the property can effectively be frozen and will require a series of costly headaches to un-freeze.

“A trust can’t become incapacitated,” Altro said.

Many property advisers recommend setting up a corporation to hold and manage U.S. property assets, though Altro said that is not tax effective.

Capital gains on a cross-border trust are taxed at about 15%, compared with a rate of more than 40% for corporations in Florida.

Although there are fees involved with setting up such a trust, Altro says “they are very small” compared with the costs of a potential tax bill or legal help to sort out problems once they have occurred.

There may be another upside for Canadians wanting to buy U.S. property. If they choose to become U.S. residents their income tax bills will drop substantially. Altro said the maximum U.S. income tax is 35% and that kicks in on earnings of more than $375,000. In Canada, the high rate is 46% on income of more than $125,000.

But for many that requires obtaining an elusive Green Card. A bill put forward by two U.S. senators eager to promote further investment in the country’s sagging real estate market may put a visa within reach.

The bipartisan proposal put forward last month would grant a visa to foreigners spending at least $500,000 on residential property.

Residential sales of U.S. properties to foreigners and recent immigrants totalled $82 billion in the 12-month period ended March 31, up from $66 billion the previous year, according to the National Association of Realtors. California accounted for 12% of those sales, second only to Florida.

David A. Altro featured on Droit Inc.


Investissements immobiliers aux USA: la bonne méthode, selon un avocat

www.droitinc.com
Par Agence QMI
Le 14 novembre 2011


C’est le point de vue de David Altro, avocat et auteur d’un livre sur le sujet. L’ouvrage, intitulé Owning U.S. Property – The Canadian Way, en est à sa deuxième édition.

« J’ai écrit ce livre parce que les Canadiens qui veulent acheter aux États-Unis ou s’y installer sont confrontés à trop d’informations erronées », a-t-il dit.

Selon M. Altro, c’est surtout au sujet des comptes de taxes et des démarches à effectuer dans le cas d’une succession que les informations pertinentes manquent.

Pourtant, les embûches peuvent être facilement évitées, explique David Altro, en créant une fiducie transfrontalière irrévocable. Cette structure permet en effet de protéger les héritiers d’éventuels créanciers et de contourner la réglementation américaine sur les successions, souvent coûteuse.

Mettre une propriété en fiducie présente aussi des avantages si l’un des deux conjoints se retrouve privé de capacité légale. D’après la loi américaine, dans un tel cas, toutes les opérations concernant la propriété sont bloquées et lever ce blocage peut s’avérer particulièrement long et difficile.

« Une fiducie ne peut pas être privée de capacité légale », a expliqué David Altro.

De nombreux conseillers financiers recommandent, pour leur part, de créer une société par actions pour gérer les propriétés aux États-Unis, mais, selon M. Altro, ce n’est pas une solution idéale sur le plan fiscal.

Les profits sur cession réalisés dans le cadre de fiducies transfrontalières sont taxés à hauteur de 15 %, alors que dans le cas d’une société par actions, ce taux peut monter à 40 %, comme en Floride.

Créer une fiducie a bien sûr un coût, a reconnu David Altro, mais ce coût est bien inférieur à ce qu’il faudrait payer en compte de taxes ou pour obtenir de l’aide juridique dans le cas d’une succession, d’une incapacité légale ou de tout autre problème.

Faire des États-Unis son lieu de résidence présente par ailleurs de sérieux avantages fiscaux pour ceux qui veulent accéder à la propriété au sud de la frontière.

Aux États-Unis, le taux d’imposition maximum est de 35%, et il s’applique aux ménages disposant de revenus supérieurs à 375 000 $. Au Canada, le taux maximum est de 46 % et il s’applique à partir de 125 000 $ de revenus.

Devenir résident permanent aux États-Unis nécessite une carte verte, mais ce document n’est pas facile à obtenir. Deux sénateurs américains ont toutefois proposé une loi pour faciliter l’obtention de visas pour ceux qui veulent acheter aux États-Unis. Ils estiment que cela permettrait de stimuler le marché immobilier, actuellement en plein marasme.

Selon cette proposition, déposée le mois dernier à Washington, tout étranger investissant au moins 500 000 $ dans l’immobilier résidentiel pourrait obtenir un visa de résident permanent.

Les ventes de propriétés résidentielles américaines à des étrangers ou des immigrants récemment arrivés aux États-Unis ont atteint 80 milliards $ pour la période de 12 mois achevée en mars 2011, comparativement à 66 milliards $ pour la même période de l’année précédente, selon l’Association nationale des agents immobiliers américains.

To read this article in English, please click here.

Why Legal Representation is Essential for Canadians Purchasing Property in the U.S.



In the last few years, the U.S. real estate market has sparked interest in the eyes of Canadian investors. We are not solely talking about major investors, but smaller players looking to purchase a second home to escape those long Canadian winters.

The process of purchasing U.S. real estate can be quite daunting for Canadians. As a result, this text will look at the process of purchasing U.S. real estate and discuss the benefits that legal representation provides to Canadian buyers purchasing property south of the border.

Although we will not discuss the differences between straight sales, foreclosures and short sales, it is important that you are aware of their differences, as they have various implications for the buyer. For more information on these topics, please refer here.

The logical place to start for any Canadian looking to make a U.S. real estate purchase is to find a realtor who can assist in finding the right properties. However, it is important that you choose your realtor wisely. Unfortunately, not all realtors are the same, and there are some who understand the needs of Canadians far better than others. This may not seem overly important, but when a U.S. realtor is looking for a property for a U.S. client, the implications are different than when that client is Canadian. For example, a realtor who understands the needs of Canadians will know to ask the right questions such as, “Will you be renting the property out for half of the year?” or, “Will you be coming down during the holidays with your extended family?” and so on. These questions can save time when you are trying to narrow down the right property for purchase. By knowing the answer to such questions, your realtor will be able to avoid condominiums that prohibit some of these things within their rules and regulations.

However, a great realtor is no replacement for legal representation. Having a lawyer on your side will enable you to have your initial offer to purchase reviewed prior to submission. This will allow you to truly understand the terms and conditions of the contract into which you are entering and ensure that any loose ends and negotiating tactics are taken care of. I have had personal experiences with realtors who failed to read through a purchase contract in detail. They simply filled out the provisions to their liking and asked their client to sign.

I know that there are realtors out there reading this who are taking my comments as a personal attack on their reputations. I would like to emphasize that there are many realtors out there who are very detail-oriented and truly look after the best interests of their clients. If that is you, then my previous statement does not apply to you. However, as in any profession, there are individuals who do not do their job with the high standards one would expect, especially when you are talking about a substantial purchase such as real estate. A lawyer helps to ensure that your contract is drafted with your best interests in mind – not with the sole purpose of closing a deal.

Once your realtor has found the property of your dreams and you have an accepted offer, the countdown to closing begins. This is when the title company takes over. Who is the title company? They are a neutral third party designated in the contract to transfer ownership to the buyer. They are responsible for ensuring that conveyance is done properly by verifying that there have been no defects in the chain of title leading up to your ownership. They will ensure that there are no liens that could force you to lose the property at a later date. They also issue title insurance in case a lien or defect in title was overlooked. Finally, the title company prepares all necessary closing documents to be signed by the buyer and seller.

Once again, it is worthwhile to have legal representation at this point in the purchasing process. A lawyer reviews all the documents prepared by the title company in order to ensure that they have been prepared correctly. This involves reviewing estoppel letters from the condo association, previous county tax bills, the closing statement and conveyance documents to ensure that title is being conveyed to the correct party. The latter is even more important when your purchase is not being made personally, but by an entity set up for the purpose of holding title to the property. In addition, a lawyer will verify the conditions that need to be met in order for the buyer to obtain the title insurance discussed above. In the event that closing takes place and one or more of the conditions for title insurance have not been met, the buyer could be faced with a situation where they are not protected against prior liens or defects in title. This could lead to a partial or total loss of property.

Many people are not aware that, in the U.S., one does not need to be physically present on the day of closing. Buyers can elect for what is called a “mail-away closing”. For these closings, the title company sends all the documents that the buyer needs to sign via mail or e-mail. These documents are then executed here in Canada and sent back to the title company by the day of closing.

Once again, having legal representation can make this process go much more smoothly than it otherwise might. For starters, your lawyer will deal with the title company from start to finish, allowing you to relax and not worry about the hassle of everything discussed above. Your lawyer will guide you through all of the steps leading up to closing and will ultimately allow you to close in their office here in Canada. During your closing, a lawyer can assist even further by discussing the best strategy for payment, allowing for better tax planning down the road.

In light of everything discussed, there is no question that purchasing in the U.S. can seem overwhelming. Having the right support to guide you through the process can make all the difference in the world.

David A. Altro featured in the Globe and Mail

There’s no place like a second home for wealthy investors

AUGUSTA DWYER
The Globe and Mail
November 18, 2011

As wealthy foreign buyers snap up more and more luxury homes in Canada, high-net-worth Canadians are similarly showing strong interest in purchasing multimillion-dollar residences abroad. But while their sights were once set on a French château, perhaps, or a Tuscan villa, the trend now is towards buying in the United States.

“We’ve really seen a fall-off in buying in Europe because of all the confusion over the past 12 months or so,” says Don Campbell, president of Abbotsford, B.C.-based Cutting Edge Research Inc. and the author of five best-selling books on real estate investing.

With so much volatility in Europe, especially in Spain, Portugal and Italy, “people don’t know in which direction the market is heading, or the direction of the potential tax implications,” he says. France has just added a new tax on foreign property owners, and the market in Dubai “is getting hammered,” he explains.

Currency fluctuations can cause real estate values to plummet in real terms, while economic woes often leave European governments with little choice but to raise taxes on properties belonging to the super rich.

As a result, says Mr. Campbell, there’s a lot of confusion about where high-net-worth individuals should buy that second property. Hence the popularity of buying in the U.S., where as Mr. Campbell says “you know what you’re getting”.

Other destinations of choice right now are stable tropical nations, such as Costa Rica and Panama. But, he says, “No.1 is the U.S. There’s no question about that.”

The financial incentives for buying luxury residences south of the border are obvious. “They’re at a historic low in terms of pricing,” said Chris Potter, a partner in the Toronto PricewaterhouseCoopers real estate practice.

Lawyer David Altro, author of Owning U.S. Property: The Canadian Way, also finds high-net-worth Canadians are increasingly attracted to real estate prospects south of the border. He says his clients in the eastern part of the country tend to buy in south Florida, while those in the West are eyeing properties in exclusive California cities such as Palm Springs, Desert Palms and Rancho Mirage, or in Hawaii.

The main reasoning behind such preferences is ease of access. Direct and relatively short flights mean less stress and hassle in travelling back and forth between Canadian and U.S. homes.

“They are also liking those areas because they have health care there, too,” he says. “But the bottom line is, we like to go south in the winter to get out of the Canadian weather and play golf and go to the beach. So no matter what the U.S. real estate market is like, it’s always going to be busy.”

Mr. Altro says many boomers and high-net-worth Canadians are taking up permanent residence in the U.S. With a much lighter tax regime “on a regular annual income basis,” he points out, “we have a steady stream of high-net-worth Canadians who are moving to the States. I have a client in Vancouver, worth about $50-million, and all that invested money in Canada is being taxed at such a high rate. Move to the U.S. and it’s like they have a new annual revenue.”

Hunter Milborne, a partner at Sotheby’s International Real Estate, explains why buying a property needs to be planned correctly. If a Canadian owns a property personally, “they have a fairly onerous estate tax [on inheritances], whereas if you own something corporately or through a trust, then that’s not the case.”

For Mr. Campbell, another issue implicit in owning foreign property is having sound insurance advice. “Being such a litigious country, you better have an incredibly good insurance agent for liability, fire and all the things you need to protect yourself for down there,” he says.

“If you’re buying into a gated community or a high-end condo, check to make sure how many of those properties are actually in use, as opposed to being in arrears, foreclosure or owned by a bank,” he says.

“Because the community still needs money to run … a lot of people who buy into those semi-deserted gated communities because it’s relatively inexpensive, find that their fees and operating costs can start to really go through the roof.”

There are, however, many Canadian multimillionaires opting to simply stay put, keeping the Canadian market in luxury real estate buoyant.

“The real favourite right now is keeping money in your hands and in your own country,” says Mr. Campbell, “especially with the global confusion that’s going on, and economic and political confusion in the U.S.”

David A. Altro interviewed by BuzzBuzzHome.com



BuzzBuzHome.com, a website that is, “focused on cataloguing all new residential projects in Canada, connecting purchasers directly with sellers, and providing social tools that enable collaboration amongst purchasers and industry experts” recently interviewed David for their blog.

Tax law extraordinaire, David A. Altro, teaches us how to own US property the Canadian way


BuzzBuzHome Blog
November 14, 2011

Today we had the opportunity to speak with David A. Altro, the managing partner at the law firm Altro and Associates. With 30 years of experience and offices in several Canadian and American cities, David is the go-to guy for advice if you’re considering purchasing property or moving to the US.

Now we’re sure he wouldn’t mind if you showed up at his office or gave him a call on his cell with your question about purchasing property in the US, but why inconvenience yourself when you could just read the latest edition of his book “Owning U.S. Property the Canadian Way.

In our interview David discusses the important points contained within the updated and expanded second edition and talks about why purchasing property in the US doesn’t have to be a hassle.

This Friday (November 18) there’s a seminar in Toronto at the Westin Prince called “Moving to the US the Canadian Way.” If you’re interested in learning more, you can register for the seminar on the Altro and Associates website.

And now, here’s David!

BBH: Tell us a bit about your firm?

DA: I’m managing partner at the law firm Altro and Associates. We’ve got offices in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver and three in Florida and one in Phoenix.

BBH: How long have you been involved in this industry?

DA: When I moved to Florida in 1982, I got a US law degree and became a member of the Florida Bar in 1984. Since then, I’ve been working in tax and cross border planning. In 1988 I moved back to Canada with my family and continued on. The whole practice grew and grew.

BBH: This is the second edition of your book “Owning US Property the Canadian Way” was just published. When did the first edition come out?

DA: 2009.

BBH: What did you hope to accomplish when you set out to write the initial edition of the book?

DA: I wanted to help demystify the issues people were raising. These issues were causing Canadians to worry about buying US property. The book is meant to help Canadians understand the issues and to plan properly to avoid the problems.

BBH: What’s new in the second edition of the book?

DA: On December 17, 2010, the US signed in a new tax law that affects Canadians. I wanted to explain it and provide new tax planning to avoid the problems. The other reason is a lot of Canadians want to move to the US so I did a chapter on moving to the US “the Canadian way.” On Friday I’m the speaker at a seminar at the Westin Prince in Toronto put on by Cross Border Planning Partners and it’s called “Moving to the US the Canadian Way”.

BBH: Some people might say, considering the economic climate in the US, why is it still a good time to buy property in the US for Canadians?

DA: Because the Canadian dollar is historically low, all the US real estate is on sale and interest rates are very low.

BBH: What are some of the most popular places to invest in the US for Canadians?

DA: Florida is number one. Traditionally, most Canadians go to Florida and Ontarians go to Florida the most. It’s got the ocean and it’s traditionally been a great direct flight down. If you look at Florida, Arizona, California or Texas, all of them have seen the prices come down dramatically.

BBH: What are some common mistakes people make when purchasing property in the US?

DA: Putting the title to the property in their name personally. That leaves them exposed to a few problems. Number one if Florida probate on death. That’s the legal procedure required in Florida when you die to transfer the property to your beneficiary. It’s expensive, time consuming and it freezes the estate. If you put it in a “cross-border irrevocable trust” then it avoids that problem.

The second problem is if you pass away then you may have the US estate tax, but if you have it in trust, the trust doesn’t die. You own the trust, the trust owns the property so upon death, there’s no tax.

BBH: You bring up some “red flags” in the book. What are some of the most important red flags to look out for?

DA: One of the red flags is if you put in a corporation, the red flag is you’re going to have high capital gains tax. Another red flag is if you need financing, you can’t get financing in a corporation. You need to watch out for those type of things. Another one is if you become mentally incapacitated and you have the property in your name personally, you’re going to have to go through a Florida guardianship procedure which can be very expensive. Put it in the trust so these red flags aren’t going to hit you.

BBH: Do you think you’ll keep putting out new editions of the book in the future?

DA: Absolutely! There’s one thing we know about tax law, it’s always going to change. It’s always tied to the politicians, politicians trying to get into power and making new tax plans.

Thanks for chatting with us David!

David A. Altro interviewed for Sun Media



David was interviewed by Sharon Singleton of QMI Agency for Sun Media. The article appeared in the Toronto Sun, Calgary Sun, on Canoe.ca and many other news outlets and law and tax websites.

U.S. property investment pitfalls easy to overcome

Sun Media
Sharon Singleton, QMI Agency
November 10, 2011

A growing number of Canadians are tempted by property bargains in the U.S., but are being put off by bad information about the possible tax pitfalls, according to David Altro, a lawyer and author of a book on the subject.

The baby boomer generation is looking for a warm place to retire and being lured by property at bargain-basement levels, making Canadians the biggest foreign investors in U.S. real estate.

“I wrote this book because there is a lot of mis-information out there for Canadians wanting to buy or move to the U.S.,” Altro said, whose Owning U.S. Property The Canadian Way is now into its second edition.

Much of it revolves around the potential tax bill and bureaucratic headaches for family members trying to sort out the estate upon the death of the property owner.

Altro said a lot of these problems can be avoided completely by setting up an irrevocable cross-border trust. That will help provide protection from creditors for your children and get around expensive U.S. laws on probate.

Similarly, placing your property in a trust is also beneficial if either you or your spouse becomes incapacitated. Under U.S. law, if one person becomes incapacitated the property can effectively be frozen and will require a series of costly headaches to un-freeze.

“A trust can’t become incapacitated,” Altro said.

Many property advisers recommend setting up a corporation to hold and manage U.S. property assets, though Altro said that is not tax effective.

Capital gains on a cross-border trust are taxed at about 15%, compared with a rate of more than 40% for corporations in Florida.

Although there are fees involved with setting up such a trust, Altro says “they are very small” compared with the costs of a potential tax bill or legal help to sort out problems once they have occurred.

There may be another upside for Canadians wanting to buy U.S. property. If they choose to become U.S. residents their income tax bills will drop substantially. Altro said the maximum U.S. income tax is 35% and that kicks in on earnings of more than $375,000. In Canada, the high rate is 46% on income of more than $125,000.

But for many that requires obtaining an elusive Green Card. A bill put forward by two U.S. senators eager to promote further investment in the country’s sagging real estate market may put a visa within reach.

The bipartisan proposal put forward last month would grant a visa to foreigners spending at least $500,000 on residential property.

Residential sales of U.S. properties to foreigners and recent immigrants totalled $82 billion in the 12-month period ended March 31, up from $66 billion the previous year, according to the National Association of Realtors. California accounted for 12% of those sales, second only to Florida.

David A. Altro to be Keynote Speaker in Toronto Workshop




If you are interested in attending, please REGISTER TODAY as spaces are limited!
This workshop is for Canadians considering moving to the U.S. It will cover immigration strategies, U.S. estate and tax planning, banking and financing, healthcare coverage, potential tax savings as a U.S. resident and much more.

David A. Altro featured on Alberta Primetime TV and Shaw TV


David A. Altro has been touring across Canada to promote his new book Owning U.S. Property – The Canadian Way, 2nd Edition. He has made appearances on the radio, television, and in print as an expert in cross border tax and estate planning.

Click here to watch the full length interview of David on Alberta Primetime as he takes part in a lively discussion on key topics such as cross border real estate and tax planning.

David was also interview on Shaw TV, view the video below!