Modified Carryover Basis Regime – U.S. Estate Tax for Deaths that Occurred in 2010



On Dec. 17, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act. Among other provisions, the Tax Relief Act modified and extended the estate tax provisions of 2010 through Dec. 31, 2012 only, resulting in a retroactive reinstatement of the U.S. estate tax for deaths that occurred in 2010.

For beneficiaries of decedents in 2010, U.S. Congress provided two systems of taxing estates and determining basis of their assets: the decedent’s beneficiaries will have the choice of either applying the federal estate tax or making use of the “modified carryover basis regime.”

Executors of those estates are left to determine the better course.

To do so, especially for valuations of gross estates valued over the new $5 million exclusion, they must take many factors and considerations into account. The beneficiaries will need to choose between receiving an unlimited “step up” and use the available $5 million exclusion or elect out of the U.S. estate tax, chose a limited step up in the taxation basis of the inherited property and, instead allow assets to pass tax-free to the beneficiaries under the modified carryover basis regime with its own basis for exclusions but without the step-up to fair market value upon the date of death.

For income tax purposes, the income tax basis of an asset is the price paid for the property plus the value of certain improvements. In the case of stocks and bonds, the basis equals the purchase price whereas for real estate the basis equals the purchase price plus the value of all capital improvements (special assessments levied during the years of ownership) as well as real estate closing costs.

For the tax years prior to and following 2010, beneficiaries of an estate are entitled to receive a “step up” in the basis of the property they inherit meaning regardless of what the decedent paid for the property, the beneficiaries will inherit the property at the fair market value as of the date of death. So if the decedent paid $500,000 for the real estate and did not make any capital improvements and at the date of death the fair market value of the real estate had increased to $750,000, then the beneficiaries would inherit the property with a stepped up income tax basis of $750,000.

“Modified Carryover Basis Regime”

Only for deaths that occurred in 2010 would the decedent’s beneficiaries have the choice to either take a full step up in basis or use the modified carryover basis regime. If the beneficiaries opt to apply the modified carryover basis rules, then it means that the property will pass at the lesser of:

    A) the fair market value on the date of death; or
    B) the decedent’s original income tax basis in the property plus the value of certain improvements, but not at the full stepped up basis.

For example, if a decedent paid $300,000 for real estate and did not make any capital improvements to it, and the fair market value at the date of death in 2010 increased to $500,000, then the beneficiaries would inherit the property with a carryover income tax basis of $300,000. However, if the fair market of the value of the property decreased to $200,000 upon the decedent’s date of death, then the beneficiaries’ basis in the property would only be $200,000.

That said, the carryover basis is subject to adjustment under the modified carryover basis rules. Where the decedent is neither a resident nor a citizen of the U.S. (Canadian decedent owning US real estate), the modified basis carryover rules limit the amount of the basis increase to $60,000 (as opposed to $1,300,000 for a US resident/citizen).

Examples of Applying the Modified Carryover Basis Regime to a Deceased Person’s Property

Using the example above, a non-spouse beneficiary can only increase the carryover basis by up to $60,000 so that the non-spouse’s beneficiary’s modified carryover basis will be $360,000 instead of $500,000.

Thus, if the beneficiary sells the property with a modified carryover basis of $360,000 shortly after the decedent’s death for the fair market value of $500,000, then the beneficiary will owe capital gains tax on the net gain of $140,000, which is the difference between the sales price and the non-spouse beneficiary’s modified carryover basis:

$500,000 – $360,000 fair market value modified carryover basis = $140,000 net gain

Contrast this with the sale of the property by applying a full step up in basis, in which case the basis of the property will be stepped up to the date of death value of $500,000 so that the sale will not generate any capital gains taxes:

$500,000 fair market value – $500,000 stepped up basis = $0 net gain

Using the same example, if the property has an original income tax basis of $300,000 but the date of death fair market value has decreased to $200,000, then the basis inherited by the beneficiaries will be $200,000 because the basis cannot be increased beyond the fair market value at date of death.

In light of the above, estate planners who have clients who died in 2010 will have to work with the deceased client’s estate representative to determine whether to make an election provided under the Tax Relief Act.

If the client’s estate is worth less than $5 million, the estate representative generally will not make the election when filing form 706NA “United States Estate (and Generation-
Skipping Transfer) Tax Return: Estate of nonresident not a citizen of the United States”. Doing so will allow the assets of the estate to receive a step-up in basis; and the estate representative will not have to deal with the obscure modified carryover basis rules.

If the client’s estate is worth more than $5 million, the client’s estate representative may opt for the Modified Carryover Basis regime by preparing and filing no later than January 17, 2012 form 8939: “Allocation of Increase in Basis for Property Acquired From a Decedent: To be filed for decedents dying after December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2011”.

Factors that may provide the estate planner with hints of the best strategy to deploy include:

  • Fair Market Value of the property (i.e. gain or loss vs. Tax basis);
  • Anticipated future sale of the property;
  • Estate tax vs. Capital Gain tax;
  • Canadian deemed disposition at date of death; and
  • The relative size of the estate.

Canadian executors should always seek advice from qualified Cross Border tax and estate Specialists.

Radio Show – November 24, 2011

Montreal, Quebec – November 24, 2011

On the November 24th episode of Dollars and Sense on CJAD 800 AM, host, Matt Altro and legal expert David A. Altro discuss Owning U.S. Property – The Canadian Way, 2nd Edition and all the important issues surrounding Canadians buying property in the U.S. and moving to the U.S.

David answers your questions and explains U.S. tax laws and their implications and how to protect yourself and your family from the U.S. probate procedure, creditors, taxes and much more.

Click here for part 1

Click here for part 2

Click here for part 3

Click here for part 4

Click here for part 5

Click here for part 6

Why Legal Representation is Essential for Canadians Purchasing Property in the U.S.



In the last few years, the U.S. real estate market has sparked interest in the eyes of Canadian investors. We are not solely talking about major investors, but smaller players looking to purchase a second home to escape those long Canadian winters.

The process of purchasing U.S. real estate can be quite daunting for Canadians. As a result, this text will look at the process of purchasing U.S. real estate and discuss the benefits that legal representation provides to Canadian buyers purchasing property south of the border.

Although we will not discuss the differences between straight sales, foreclosures and short sales, it is important that you are aware of their differences, as they have various implications for the buyer. For more information on these topics, please refer here.

The logical place to start for any Canadian looking to make a U.S. real estate purchase is to find a realtor who can assist in finding the right properties. However, it is important that you choose your realtor wisely. Unfortunately, not all realtors are the same, and there are some who understand the needs of Canadians far better than others. This may not seem overly important, but when a U.S. realtor is looking for a property for a U.S. client, the implications are different than when that client is Canadian. For example, a realtor who understands the needs of Canadians will know to ask the right questions such as, “Will you be renting the property out for half of the year?” or, “Will you be coming down during the holidays with your extended family?” and so on. These questions can save time when you are trying to narrow down the right property for purchase. By knowing the answer to such questions, your realtor will be able to avoid condominiums that prohibit some of these things within their rules and regulations.

However, a great realtor is no replacement for legal representation. Having a lawyer on your side will enable you to have your initial offer to purchase reviewed prior to submission. This will allow you to truly understand the terms and conditions of the contract into which you are entering and ensure that any loose ends and negotiating tactics are taken care of. I have had personal experiences with realtors who failed to read through a purchase contract in detail. They simply filled out the provisions to their liking and asked their client to sign.

I know that there are realtors out there reading this who are taking my comments as a personal attack on their reputations. I would like to emphasize that there are many realtors out there who are very detail-oriented and truly look after the best interests of their clients. If that is you, then my previous statement does not apply to you. However, as in any profession, there are individuals who do not do their job with the high standards one would expect, especially when you are talking about a substantial purchase such as real estate. A lawyer helps to ensure that your contract is drafted with your best interests in mind – not with the sole purpose of closing a deal.

Once your realtor has found the property of your dreams and you have an accepted offer, the countdown to closing begins. This is when the title company takes over. Who is the title company? They are a neutral third party designated in the contract to transfer ownership to the buyer. They are responsible for ensuring that conveyance is done properly by verifying that there have been no defects in the chain of title leading up to your ownership. They will ensure that there are no liens that could force you to lose the property at a later date. They also issue title insurance in case a lien or defect in title was overlooked. Finally, the title company prepares all necessary closing documents to be signed by the buyer and seller.

Once again, it is worthwhile to have legal representation at this point in the purchasing process. A lawyer reviews all the documents prepared by the title company in order to ensure that they have been prepared correctly. This involves reviewing estoppel letters from the condo association, previous county tax bills, the closing statement and conveyance documents to ensure that title is being conveyed to the correct party. The latter is even more important when your purchase is not being made personally, but by an entity set up for the purpose of holding title to the property. In addition, a lawyer will verify the conditions that need to be met in order for the buyer to obtain the title insurance discussed above. In the event that closing takes place and one or more of the conditions for title insurance have not been met, the buyer could be faced with a situation where they are not protected against prior liens or defects in title. This could lead to a partial or total loss of property.

Many people are not aware that, in the U.S., one does not need to be physically present on the day of closing. Buyers can elect for what is called a “mail-away closing”. For these closings, the title company sends all the documents that the buyer needs to sign via mail or e-mail. These documents are then executed here in Canada and sent back to the title company by the day of closing.

Once again, having legal representation can make this process go much more smoothly than it otherwise might. For starters, your lawyer will deal with the title company from start to finish, allowing you to relax and not worry about the hassle of everything discussed above. Your lawyer will guide you through all of the steps leading up to closing and will ultimately allow you to close in their office here in Canada. During your closing, a lawyer can assist even further by discussing the best strategy for payment, allowing for better tax planning down the road.

In light of everything discussed, there is no question that purchasing in the U.S. can seem overwhelming. Having the right support to guide you through the process can make all the difference in the world.

More Sunshine Ahead for Canadian Snowbirds?

A new bill introduced by two U.S. senators is designed to have foreigners spur on the struggling U.S. economy. Senators Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) and Mike Lee (R-UT) have introduced The Visa Improvements to Stimulate International Tourism to the United States Act (VISIT-USA Act). The new legislation proposes two different variations of a 3-year non-immigrant residential visa. One of which is a “home ownership visa” which is the subject of this blog post.

The VISIT-USA Act would create a new visa for Canadians citizens who meet the following conditions:

1. Uses at least $500,000 in cash to purchase 1 or more residences in the United States. Each property must be purchased for more than 100 percent of the most recent appraised value; and

2. Maintains ownership of residential property in the United States worth at least $500,000; and

3. Resides for more than 180 days per year in a residence in the United States that is worth at least $250,000; and

4. Are not otherwise inadmissible;

Under current immigration law Canadians visitors cannot spend more than 180 days in the U.S. The new visa would extend the number of days Canadians could stay in the U.S. from 180 to 240 per year and would be renewable every 3 years. If this bill were to become law we may see a radical change to the migration patters of thousands of Canadian snowbirds.

At first blush Canadian boomers may be excited about the prospects of a year round golf season. A word of caution to retirees who will be lining up at U.S. immigration offices like teenagers at Apple stores: before making any moves it is critical to understand all the personal, financial and tax impacts of such a lifestyle.

The visa would not allow Canadians to work in the U.S. or obtain any U.S. benefits such as social security or Medicare. Canadians who will be increasing their time in the U.S. may lose their Canadian health care benefits. This means that private insurance becomes a threshold issue and is a must have for anyone considering the proposed visa. In addition, Canadians may wind up becoming tax residents of the U.S. and paying tax to the IRS on their worldwide income. While getting involved with the IRS sounds like a dicey proposition for most Canadians, this actually may be a good thing as U.S. income tax rates are significantly lower than Canadian income tax rates.

The Canada U.S. Tax Treaty has been designed in such a way that you can only be a tax resident of either the U.S. or Canada. Tax residency is a question of fact. Some of the key questions to ask to determine tax residency are:

Where do you spend the majority of your time?
Where does your immediate family reside?
Where is your socio-economic center?

Becoming a tax resident of the U.S. means you are becoming a non-resident of Canada for tax purposes. When a Canadian cuts ties with Canada from a tax perspective this may give rise to departure tax issues. Careful planning must be done in advance to analyze one’s assets with the objective of deferring, minimizing or eliminating departure tax issues.

U.S. tax residency has numerous advantages for Canadian retirees. Lower income tax rates on income and pensions, no OAS clawback and an opportunity to possibly withdraw proceeds from RRSPs / RRIFs nearly tax free are a few of the highlights. Once the dust settles, Canadians may find that they have additional after tax dollars to use and enjoy in their new sun filled retirement.

Stay tuned for more on this new Bill. At this point we do not know if the VISIT-USA Act will become law but one thing is for sure, second to the Habs-Leafs hockey rivalry, this may be the most debated topic in South Florida this coming winter.

Register now for a workshop for Canadians interested in Moving to the U.S. taking place on November 18, 2011 in Toronto, ON.

Follow Matt Altro on Twitter at @MattAltro

Will a Short Sale Leave You Feeling Shortchanged?



We are now about three years into the recession, and there’s no denying that property prices in the U.S. are still at affordable lows. As winter creeps up on us, many Canadians are likely researching just how much a nice little vacation home might cost.

I applaud that line of thinking (as soon as winter hits, I drink Vitamin D drops almost as quickly as the snow falls in a blizzard), but I urge caution on one major issue: if you come across a short sale property and decide to put an offer on it, make sure you have legal counsel to guide you through your real estate transaction.

Short sales occur when a homeowner needs to get out of a mortgage because they are in financial trouble, and they can’t pay off their loan. The seller will put their house on the market, price it attractively and then cross their fingers and hope that their lender will approve the sale and accept its proceeds as full payoff for their loan – even if the seller will fall short of paying back everything they owe.

While Altro & Associates, LLP is known for cross border estate and tax planning, we are also experienced at guiding our clients through real estate purchases in the U.S. We specialize in advocating for our clients throughout their purchasing process, which becomes even more important when a property is being sold short.

I’ll use a real example from our practice to illustrate my point. Earlier this year, Jacques and Alice found a beautiful condo in Miami Beach that caught their eye. Their realtor notified them that the sellers had two mortgages on the property from a bank and a private lender. The sale would have to be approved by both lenders because it would be a short sale.

Jacques and Alice decided to go forward – but they called us as soon as their offer was accepted, knowing that it would be a long road to their closing date. It’s not only been a long road, but an incredibly bumpy one too. Below is a long list of the short sale troubles that Jacques and Alice have had to endure:

  • Short sales often close at the last minute; the lender takes its time approving the sale and then demands a quick closing date with very little notice. This is what happened to Jacques and Alice. We advised the seller that we could meet the closing date deadline when they proposed it to us, but that our clients’ realtor in Florida would have to do a walk-through of the property before we would release any funds to the seller.
  • When the realtor showed up at the condo to make sure it was still in good condition, the locks had been changed and there was – wait for it – a squatter inside!
  • Needless to say, instead of celebrating a closing, eviction proceedings began. While the court proceedings dragged on, we needed to get multiple closing date extensions from the bank and the private lender.
  • Of course, to complicate an already complicated deal, our contact for the private lender was on vacation during this time, so it was extra difficult to obtain sign-off on the closing date extensions that we needed to save the deal.

  • The eviction proceedings went on for so long that the bank notified us that they were going to foreclose on the property, which would effectively kill our clients’ deal. They eventually changed their mind on this, but not before the mention of a foreclosure created heartache for our clients.

  • The eviction proceedings eventually ended, and once again, we were ready to close. This time around, however, we were notified that our clients would have to pay thousands of dollars extra in condo assessments that had become due.

  • Even though the purchase contract clearly states that the sellers were responsible for all such assessments, they were unable to afford the assessment payments, so those payments fell to our clients, if they chose to accept them as their burden.

  • Before agreeing to this extra cost, we advised our clients to review a draft settlement statement, also known as a HUD. A HUD is a document drafted by the U.S. title company in charge of creating the closing documents for a transaction. The HUD outlines the financial breakdown of a real estate transaction for both parties.

  • When we received the draft HUD and compared it to the previous one we were using before the discovery of the squatter, we noticed that the amount owing by our clients was actually LESS than before – even though they were apparently being charged more for the assessments!

  • If Jacques and Alice had reviewed this HUD and agreed to pay for the assessments, thinking they were somehow SAVING money, they would have been pleasantly UN-surprised upon receipt of the final HUD at closing, which would undoubtedly include the thousands of dollars in assessments that they would have “agreed” to paying after reviewing the incorrect draft HUD.

  • We noticed the error in the draft HUD, however, so that potential problem was avoided. We requested a revised HUD, which came with several more errors in other sections. Further drafts were also incorrect.

  • Once we received a HUD that was correct, we agreed to move forward with closing, but not before requesting that the title company do an updated lien search to make sure the property was free from any encumbrances.

  • Lo and behold, the night before closing, a federal tax lien came up on the title search, and we were once again delayed!

Not surprisingly, Jacques and Alice have still been unable to close on their property.

During the winding road described above, we advocated for Jacques and Alice by ensuring that the title company provided correct, up-to-date information at all points. We caught errors that could have easily gone unnoticed by reviewing all documents with a fine-toothed comb and knowing exactly what to look for. We coordinated and corresponded with the various parties involved in this complicated transaction so that our clients didn’t have to be the quarterbacks on so many moving pieces.

In short (no pun intended!), title companies create closing documents, but they don’t work on behalf of buyers. A really great realtor is a huge asset in a transaction like the one detailed here, but he or she doesn’t review important closing documents to make sure that you are legally protected.

Real estate lawyers are there for you, and you alone. When Jacques and Alice finally close on their dream home in Florida, we will be there with them, and they will have the peace of mind that comes with knowing that they weren’t alone, navigating the muddied waters of a short sale without a compass to guide them to legal safety.

Radio Show – September 27, 2011

Montreal, Quebec – September 27, 2011

On the September 27th episode of Dollars and Sense on CJAD 800 AM, host, Matt Altro and legal expert David A. Altro discuss David’s new book, Owning U.S. Property – The Canadian Way, the new U.S. estate tax laws, moving to the U.S. and take questions from listeners live on the air!

Click here for part 1

Click here for part 2

Click here for part 3

Click here for part 4

Click here for part 5

Click here for part 6

Radio Show – August 25, 2011

Montreal, Quebec – August 25, 2011

On the August 25th episode of Dollars and Sense on CJAD 800 AM, host, Matt Altro and legal expert David A. Altro discuss why now is the time to buy property in the U.S., the difference between U.S. and Canadian tax laws, and much more!

In part 2, David tells listeners some disadvantages of holding a property in a corporation and explains the U.S. amnesty program. Nick calls in about owning a property in Florida and what problems he may encounter in the future. David explains to Eleanor, a U.S. citizen living in Canada, the forms she must file to avoid potential tax problems.

In part 3, Matt and David talk about changes to the U.S. estate tax laws and explain two questions everyone must ask themselves concerning U.S. estate tax exposure. You can calculate your own U.S. estate tax exposure here.

In part 4, David talks about the launch of his new book, Owning U.S. Property – The Canadian Way, 2nd Edition, and Marco calls in to ask about holding properties in a corporation vs. in a Cross Border Trust. Finally, Matt explains the major issues concerning moving to the U.S. that Canadians need to be aware of, as well as some options to explore for getting a green card.

Click here for part 1

Click here for part 2

Click here for part 3

Click here for part 4

Radio Show – May 24, 2011

Montreal, Quebec – May 24, 2011

On the March 24, 2011 episode of “Dollars and Sense” on CJAD 800 AM, host, Matt Altro and legal expert David A. Altro discussed various problems and solutions for Canadians who own or who are looking to purchase U.S. property.

In parts 1 and 2, David gives advice on how to choose what area in the U.S. to buy property in, what type of offer to make and issues that can arise, such as probate and U.S. estate tax.

In Part 3, Matt and David take calls from listeners. Jean asks about dual citizenship and inheritance. Rudy wants to know how U.S. and Canadian residency can effects executors of a will and Bob asks about incorporating his business when he moves from Quebec to Ontario.

In Part 4, Catherine asks about shares purchased over 30 years ago and their effect on her ability to get a loan today.

Then, David turns the tables on Matt and asks him about Cross Border Planning Partners, the specialists in helping Canadians move to the U.S.


Click here for part 1

Click here for part 2

Click here for part 3

Click here for part 4

Altro & Associates on the Radio

Tune in to our upcoming radio show appearances:

Today’s Entrepreneur on Monday, May 16, 2011 at 7 pm on CJAD 800 AM in Montreal.

The Dollars & Sense show LIVE, Tuesday, May 24, 2011 at 7 pm on CJAD 800 AM Montreal.

The Real Estate Talk Show on Saturdays at 6 pm on Newstalk 1010 AM in Toronto.

Altro & Associates featured on The Real Estate Talk Show


David A. Altro and Matt Altro join Simon Giannini and Richard Dolan on The Real Estate Talk Show on Newstalk 1010 AM in Toronto, Ontario.

David identifies some main issues that Canadians face when buying property in the U.S. and how the Cross Border Trust℠ and other solutions can help avoid some of those issues.

Matt discusses relocation strategies and how to plan to move to the U.S.

Listen to the shows below and tune in LIVE to The Real Estate Talk Show, Saturdays at 6 pm on Newstalk 1010.


Click here for the February 26th show
Click here for The March 2nd show

Want to check out past shows or other radio content? View our Radio Shows page.